Calendar

Market calendar

Rate decisions, earnings and economic data in one place.

Next up
🔒 Members only

Never miss an important moment again

  • ▦
    The full calendarAll rate decisions, earnings and macro data, with sources.
  • ★
    Choose what you followOnly the topics you care about.
  • !
    Important newsWhat really matters, summarised briefly.
  • ⏰
    RemindersPut any moment in your own calendar in one click.
Join for free Free. Education, not advice.
World news

A new crisis like 2008 does not come out of nowhere

· 16 min read · By the BitFox newsroom

A small business owner reviews paperwork inside a shop while everyday life continues outside. AI image

Research and illustration supported by AI. Checked by the BitFox newsroom.

In short

  • The IMF sees elevated financial risks, but does not predict a new crisis like 2008.
  • AI valuations, government debt, private credit and geopolitical tensions could reinforce one another.
  • During the 2008 crisis, the US S&P 500 fell 57 percent and unemployment rose sharply.
  • A financial crisis affects more than investors. It can hit jobs, mortgages, energy prices and household budgets.

On 13 October 2026, the IMF published a warning that investors and policymakers are taking seriously. Financial markets are still functioning, but risks are building beneath the surface. The IMF points to AI investment, government debt, private lending and cyberattacks. These are not predictions of another banking crisis. They are vulnerabilities that could reinforce one another if conditions deteriorate.

The question is not simply whether another crisis will happen. The more useful question is how exposed the economy has become, what happens if several problems emerge at once, and how much of the damage eventually reaches ordinary households.

Experts see rising risks, but are not predicting another crash

The latest major warning comes from the International Monetary Fund. Its October 2026 Global Financial Stability Report says financial markets have remained resilient so far. Companies are profitable and economic growth is holding up. Even so, financial stability risks remain elevated.

The IMF identifies three developments that could put markets under pressure.

The first is the financial system's growing dependence on artificial intelligence. Companies are investing enormous sums in data centres, chips and software. Investors are paying high valuations for businesses whose future profits still have to materialise. If returns disappoint, confidence could change quickly.

The second is government debt. Countries need to borrow more and refinance existing obligations. If investors demand higher interest rates, governments face higher financing costs. That can also influence borrowing costs elsewhere in the economy.

The third is cybercrime. A major attack on a bank, payment network or critical software provider could disrupt financial services. In a highly connected system, a problem at one institution can spread to others.

The IMF is particularly concerned about how these risks interact. A fall in AI related shares, for example, could damage investor confidence. At the same time, higher interest rates could make financing more expensive for companies. If lenders become concerned about losses, they may withdraw funding or reduce new lending.

That is when a market problem can become a problem for the wider economy.

The IMF does not provide a percentage probability for a new crisis on the scale of 2008. The ECB does not publish an exact probability either. Anyone claiming there is, for example, a 70 percent chance of another global banking crisis is not quoting an established forecast from these institutions.

The official outlook does show that the risks are being taken seriously.

In its October 2026 economic outlook, the IMF projects global growth of 3.1 percent in 2026 and 3.4 percent in 2027. That is not a baseline scenario of a global economic collapse. The Fund does, however, emphasise that risks are tilted to the downside.

The European Central Bank also sees elevated vulnerabilities. Its May 2026 Financial Stability Review highlights geopolitical tensions, energy disruptions, high government debt and risks among financial institutions outside the traditional banking sector.

The ECB's next Financial Stability Review is scheduled for 18 November 2026. That report will provide a new assessment of risks in the euro area.

The 2008 comparison shows how much money is at stake

To understand the potential damage of a severe crisis, it helps to look back at the financial crisis of 2007 to 2011.

The crisis began in the United States with problems in the mortgage market. Banks had issued large amounts of risky mortgages. Those loans were bundled and sold as financial products. When more homeowners began missing payments, the risks proved much greater than many investors had expected.

Banks stopped trusting one another. Lending stalled and major financial institutions came under pressure. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 became a major turning point.

The consequences were enormous.

According to historical data from the US Federal Reserve, US gross domestic product fell by 4.3 percent between the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second quarter of 2009.

Unemployment rose from 5 percent in December 2007 to 9.5 percent in June 2009. It reached 10 percent in October 2009.

Average house prices fell approximately 30 percent between their 2006 peak and the low point in 2009. The US S&P 500 lost 57 percent between its October 2007 peak and its low in March 2009.

That last figure makes the impact on investors tangible.

In numbers: Imagine you had invested €20,000 in a broad US stock index in October 2007. A 57 percent fall would reduce its value to €8,600. That is a paper loss of €11,400. To return to €20,000 from that lower level, the investment would need to rise by about 133 percent.

A 57 percent decline therefore requires a much larger recovery than the original fall. It is a mathematical effect many investors underestimate.

Households also lost wealth. According to the Federal Reserve, the total net worth of US households and nonprofit organisations fell from approximately $69 trillion in 2007 to $55 trillion in 2009.

The consequences were not limited to the United States. European banks had bought American financial products, and European companies depended on international credit. The crisis therefore spread quickly.

European unemployment continued rising in the following years. In 2013, unemployment in the euro area reached approximately 12 percent. Some countries experienced considerably higher rates.

The lesson is clear. A financial crisis often begins somewhere most people do not follow every day. Its consequences later appear at work, at the bank and at the checkout.

Today's risks are different from those of 2008

A new crisis does not need to have the same cause as the previous one. In 2008, the main problems were risky mortgages, complex financial products and banks taking on too much risk.

In 2026, the risk picture looks different.

1. The AI market could face a correction

AI is a major driver of technology investment. Large companies are spending billions on chips, data centres and infrastructure. Investors expect those investments to generate enormous returns over time.

But what happens if companies earn less from AI than expected?

Technology shares could lose value quickly. Pension funds, investment funds and private investors with large holdings in those companies would feel the impact directly.

The IMF warns that high valuations, concentrated investments and increasing debt financing could amplify the consequences of a correction.

That does not mean AI is a bubble that must burst soon. It means the financial consequences could be significant if expectations are not met.

2. Governments have less financial room

Countries borrow money to fund spending and repay existing debt. When interest rates rise, that financing becomes more expensive.

Investors may demand higher rates if they begin to doubt a country's financial position. That makes new borrowing more expensive and puts further pressure on government budgets.

On 29 September 2026, the Bank for International Settlements, or BIS, warned that high government debt could make government bond markets more vulnerable.

Government bonds are loans to governments. They are an important part of the financial system. Banks, pension funds and insurers own large quantities of them.

If government bond values fall quickly, financial institutions can suffer losses. That may lead to sales of other investments.

3. Private credit is growing outside traditional banks

A less familiar risk is private credit. These are loans provided to companies by private credit funds rather than directly by banks.

According to the Financial Stability Board, the market was estimated at between $1.5 trillion and $2 trillion in May 2026.

The market has grown because companies can obtain financing that may not be available through a conventional bank.

The problem is that this market is less transparent. Not all loans are valued in the same way. The links between credit funds, banks, insurers and pension funds are also complex.

The Financial Stability Board warns that this market has not yet been tested during a severe economic downturn.

If companies stop repaying their loans, credit funds lose money. If those funds then need to sell investments or withdraw financing, other institutions may be affected.

4. Geopolitical tensions can affect energy and prices

Wars, trade disputes and disruptions to important shipping routes can affect supplies of oil, gas and raw materials.

The consequences can appear quickly. Energy becomes more expensive, transport costs rise and companies pass higher costs on to customers.

On 4 November 2026, Eurostat reported that euro area inflation was expected to reach 4.0 percent in October, up from 3.8 percent in September. Energy was expected to be 20.8 percent more expensive than a year earlier.

That matters. The European economy is already experiencing price pressure. Another energy shock would not arrive in an entirely calm environment.

The probability of a crisis is not the same as the damage if it happens

A common question is how likely another crisis on the scale of 2008 really is.

The honest answer is that there is no reliable exact percentage.

Central banks and international institutions use scenarios, stress tests and risk assessments. They try to estimate what would happen if certain problems emerged. That is different from predicting that a crisis will begin on a particular date.

Three scenarios help explain the difference.

Scenario 1: the economy slows but keeps growing

This is closest to the IMF's current baseline outlook.

Companies become more cautious about investing. Some shares fall. Banks become more selective about lending. Consumers postpone major purchases.

The economy grows more slowly, but there is no global banking crisis. Unemployment may rise while most financial institutions continue operating.

For households, this mainly means that money becomes harder to earn and major expenses require more attention.

Scenario 2: a severe recession with a stock market crash

In this scenario, several developments happen at once.

Technology shares fall, companies struggle to obtain credit and consumers spend less. Businesses cut investment and jobs. Banks tighten lending conditions.

A stock market decline of 30 to 40 percent would represent a severe shock in such a scenario. This is an illustrative scenario, not an IMF or ECB forecast.

House prices could come under pressure if unemployment rises and buyers find it harder to obtain financing. Companies that depend on loans could face payment difficulties.

The consequences would become visible in everyday life.

Scenario 3: a systemic crisis like 2008

This is the most severe scenario.

A problem at a major financial institution spreads to others. Banks lose confidence in one another. Lending contracts sharply. Companies struggle to finance bills and investment.

Governments and central banks need to intervene to prevent the financial system from seizing up.

The damage could include a deep recession, major stock market losses, falling house prices, bankruptcies and prolonged unemployment.

An exact repeat of 2008 is not the most logical starting point. Banks have strengthened their capital buffers and face stricter supervision. But the risk has not disappeared. Some financial risks have shifted towards institutions outside traditional banking.

That is precisely why the IMF and ECB are paying attention to private credit and the links between banks and other financial institutions.

A new crisis would affect groceries, energy and jobs too

During financial crises, people often look at stock markets first. Most households, however, feel the consequences elsewhere.

The first impact often comes through work and income.

When companies sell less, they try to reduce costs. Vacancies are cancelled and temporary contracts are not renewed. Reorganisations and redundancies may follow.

This is particularly difficult for families with only one income. Self employed people and small businesses can also lose revenue quickly.

The second impact comes through prices.

A recession does not automatically mean lower prices. This is an important misconception.

When demand falls, prices may decline. Shops have fewer customers and companies try to sell their stock. But if a crisis is caused by expensive energy, war or supply disruptions, prices can keep rising.

Economists call this stagflation: a combination of weak economic growth and high inflation.

In October 2026, the IMF devoted attention to the cost of living. Its report describes how rising prices for basic goods reduce purchasing power and can increase inequality and poverty.

Imagine a household that spends €3,000 each month.

If the cost of living rises by an average of 5 percent, the same spending pattern costs €3,150 per month. That is an extra €150. Over a year, the difference is €1,800.

If income remains unchanged, that money has to come from somewhere. Families save less, postpone purchases or use their financial reserves.

The third impact comes through housing.

People who lose their jobs may struggle to pay their mortgage or rent. Banks may impose stricter conditions on new loans. Buyers may wait, reducing the number of homes sold.

If demand falls, house prices may decline. This particularly affects households that recently bought a home with a mortgage close to its value.

The fourth impact is social.

Long periods of unemployment, financial worries and uncertainty can increase stress within families. Young people may struggle to find their first job. People postpone having children, moving house or making major purchases. Local shops and restaurants may see fewer customers.

A crisis is therefore not just an economic event. It can change how people live and the choices they make.

The Netherlands and Belgium are not equally exposed to every shock

The Netherlands and Belgium are both closely connected to the European and global economy. There are, however, important differences.

The Netherlands has a large housing market and many households with substantial mortgage debt. Its economy is internationally connected and depends on trade, services and exports.

DNB says in its spring 2026 Financial Stability Report that systemic risks in the Dutch housing market have declined in recent years.

There is still an important point to watch: almost 45 percent of Dutch mortgage debt consists of interest only mortgages, according to DNB. This makes some households more exposed to refinancing risks and interest rate changes.

The IMF also highlights high household debt and housing affordability in its analysis of the Netherlands. An economic shock can therefore be particularly difficult for households with little room in their monthly budgets.

Belgium has a different structure. Automatic wage indexation partly protects employees against inflation. Many wages and benefits are adjusted according to the applicable indexation rules when prices rise.

That supports purchasing power, but it also has another side. Higher wages can increase business costs. Companies that cannot pass those costs on to customers have less financial room.

For both countries, a major European recession would affect exports, employment, investment and government revenues.

Governments also have limited room to compensate every group fully. If public debt and interest costs are high, long lasting support programmes become harder to finance.

You can prepare without making major financial decisions out of fear

Predicting a crisis is difficult. Understanding your own financial vulnerability is much easier.

The goal is not to solve every possible event in advance. The goal is to avoid immediate financial trouble if your income temporarily disappears, costs rise or an investment loses value.

Start with your monthly expenses. Separate fixed costs from expenses you could temporarily reduce.

Think about your mortgage or rent, energy, insurance, groceries, transport, subscriptions and loans. Then calculate how much room remains if your income falls by 20 percent for a while.

A cash reserve buys time

A reserve is money you can access immediately for unexpected expenses or a temporary loss of income.

The amount depends on your situation. An employee with a permanent contract has a different level of income security from a self employed person or business owner.

A practical calculation is to use several months of essential expenses.

In numbers: Your essential monthly expenses are €2,400. A reserve covering three months would be €7,200. Six months would require €14,400. This money is intended to cover essential costs if your income temporarily disappears.

Do not use your entire current lifestyle for this calculation. Focus on the costs you need to keep a home, buy food, maintain insurance and get to work.

Review your debts and interest arrangements

Loans can put more pressure on your budget during a crisis.

Check:

  • When your fixed interest period ends.
  • Whether you have a variable interest rate.
  • How much you repay each month.
  • Whether a loan depends on your income.
  • How much room remains if fixed costs rise.

A low monthly payment today does not tell you everything about affordability two years from now.

Review your investments without focusing on one bad trading day

Investors need to account for large market declines. This applies to shares, bonds, property funds and crypto.

A portfolio worth €50,000 on paper can temporarily become worth considerably less during a severe market downturn.

That is particularly difficult if you need the money in the short term. An investment sold at an unfavourable moment can turn a temporary loss into a permanent one.

Look at how your assets are distributed, the risks you take and when you need the money. Investing in one sector or one company carries different risks from holding a broadly diversified portfolio.

Make sure your important records remain accessible

A financial crisis can coincide with outages, cyberattacks or problems at service providers.

Keep important information somewhere secure. This includes insurance policies, mortgage details, bank information, tax documents and contact details for financial institutions.

Make sure you can access your bank account through another device or an alternative authorised login method. Use secure backups and protect your passwords.

Business owners should look closely at their customers

For small businesses, falling revenue is often more dangerous than a stock market decline.

A business may appear profitable but still face problems if customers pay late while fixed costs continue.

Prepare an overview of expected income and expenses for the coming months. Identify which costs could be reduced quickly if sales decline.

Also look at customers who account for a large share of revenue. Losing one major customer can be more damaging than a general decline of 5 percent.

Make a plan for a temporary fall in income

A simple stress test can show where you are vulnerable.

Calculate what would happen if:

  • Your income fell by 20 percent for three months.
  • Your energy bill rose by 25 percent.
  • Your car suddenly needed replacing.
  • Your mortgage rate increased when the fixed period ended.
  • Your investments temporarily fell by 30 percent.

These are examples for planning, not predictions.

If one of these situations would immediately leave you short of money, you know where your financial planning needs attention.

Questions to ask yourself

  • How many months can I cover essential expenses if my income disappears?
  • What happens to my mortgage or loan when my fixed interest period ends?
  • How much of my wealth is invested in one sector, company or type of asset?
  • Can I cover my fixed costs if energy, groceries and transport become more expensive?
  • If I run a business, do I have enough cash available when customers pay late or orders disappear?

As of 10 November 2026, another financial crisis like 2008 is not a confirmed expectation. The signals from the IMF, ECB, BIS and other institutions do show vulnerabilities that could have serious consequences during a major shock. This text is educational information and not financial advice.

Sources

Share: WhatsApp LinkedIn X
Note: This is education and not financial advice. Investing and crypto carry risk and you can lose your deposit.

The best explainers in your inbox every week

Also read